Gulls: the law and the licensing

Last reviewed 25 August 2026. Every figure below is attributed to the body that published it. This is a description of the law, not legal advice.

Every gull is a protected wild bird

There is no species of gull that may be killed at will anywhere in the United Kingdom. Section 1 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 makes it an offence to intentionally kill, injure or take any wild bird, to take, damage or destroy a nest while it is in use or being built, or to take or destroy an egg. Northern Ireland has its own equivalent in the Wildlife (Northern Ireland) Order 1985. Anything otherwise caught by those offences has to be licensed.

That is the same starting point as for the feral pigeon, and it is worth stating because it is the part most often assumed away. What differs between species is not whether they are protected but which licence, if any, permits control.

No gull is on a general licence any more

A general licence is one nobody applies for: it is issued to the world, and an authorised person may act under it without contacting the regulator. That is how most routine bird control is done, and until 2019 it was how gulls were controlled too.

Between 2019 and 2020 all four nations took the large gulls off. In England, GL41, the general licence for preserving public health and public safety, runs from 1 January to 31 December 2026 and covers four species: Canada goose, feral pigeon, jackdaw and monk parakeet. No gull appears on it, nor on GL40 or GL42.

Natural England set out the change on 30 January 2020: herring gull and lesser black-backed gull had not been included in Defra's general licences issued the previous year, and control would instead be licensed individually and prioritised, generally with the protection of human life and health as the overriding priority. The stated reason was conservation status — Natural England's assessment was that the level of control being carried out was above a sustainable level for those populations.

What each nation requires now

The same comparison, cell by cell with a source and a checked date against each, is on the law by nation grid.

The conservation status behind the decision

The licensing change is not a policy preference; it is a response to published population assessments, and those assessments are what any argument about gull control now has to engage with.

Non-lethal measures come first, and that is a licence condition

In every nation the regulator expects alternatives to have been tried before it will consider licensing control, and in Wales and Scotland that expectation is stated as a condition of the application rather than as advice. The measures the regulators name are the familiar ones: proofing and exclusion of roof spaces and ledges, netting and wire, removing access to food, habitat and waste management, and deterrents.

Where a nest is already in use, removing it is itself a licensable act. The practical consequence is that proofing works before the breeding season and not during it, which is why the regulators' guidance is seasonal.